The First Law Codexery

The Bloody Hundred

A phantom name often mistaken for actual history in the First Law world.

The term 'The Bloody Hundred' does not appear in the canonical texts of Joe Abercrombie's First Law universe, nor is it recognized as a specific faction, event, or timeline entry within the published novels and short stories. While fans occasionally use evocative names for historical battles or mercenary companies mentioned in passing, this specific designation lacks authoritative backing in the established lore.

Canon Status
Not Recognized
Source Material
None (Folklore/Fan Theory)
Related Concepts
Southern War, Mercenary Companies
First Mentioned
N/A
Status
Non-Canonical

Lore & Background

Joe Abercrombie's narratives focus on the psychological toll of violence rather than cataloging it with grandiose titles. While mercenaries like Jezal dan Luthar's companions or Logen's Juz are well-documented, there is no record of a unit officially dubbed 'The Bloody Hundred.' This highlights how fan enthusiasm can sometimes create legends that outpace the actual text.

In Their Own Story

A tavern keeper wipes a mug, listening to a drunkard boast about The Bloody Hundred. He smiles, knowing the books tell a different truth, where blood is just blood and numbers are lies told by men who want to be remembered for more than they were.

Reader's Guide

There is no canonical arc or event breakdown available because this subject does not exist in the official timeline. Readers often search for it hoping to find a specific massacre or company, but the First Law series avoids such definitive numbering in its history. Instead of focusing on this term, fans are encouraged to explore the actual Southern War battles or Logen's past with the Juz.

Did You Know?

More in Story & Timeline

Elsewhere in the The First Law universe

Spotted an error? Know more?

This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record

Comments

Loading…
Open in the interactive codex →